By: Iain Sinnott - Head of International Carrier Sales at Enreach for Service Providers
The efficiency of a meeting is not just about time and travel costs. It is also about the outcomes and perhaps the contribution to a closer relationship that brings future inspiration, but have you got your balance right?
Under pandemic conditions, I – like everyone else – conducted the majority of my business in virtual meetings. In truth, virtual working was already a big part of my life as the sales of an OSS/BSS solution to BroadSoft platform owners in three continents had almost exclusively been done over eight years through virtual meetings. So the change was, in principle, not a big one for me to make.
As the weeks passed, more and more knowledge workers reported on LinkedIn that they actually felt more efficient working remotely. It is no surprise that the levels of hybrid working are remaining so high. Now, as the dust is settling, I am interested to see if the conversation regarding meetings – 1:1 or group – switches from the practicalities to the outcomes because I think it is a subject worthy of real investigation.
We were forced to learn that almost all meetings can be virtual. We have discovered that although sometimes technically challenging, most meetings can be hybrid, and we can still think back to the time when most meetings were face-to-face. So now, with choices understood, what choice do we make?
When we sell products to customers, they are actually buying the outcomes. When we agree to meet with people, there will again be outcomes in mind – but which outcomes are best served by which kind of meeting?
Let me suggest a few meeting types (I realize different sectors have different lists, but try these first):
Now, remembering that all can be done using any form of meeting, which meeting type is best for each of the above:
Virtual meetings have become essential in modern workplaces due to their efficiency, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness. Here are some key benefits:
Eliminates travel, accommodation, and venue rental costs.
Reduces office overhead expenses, making it ideal for remote teams.
Allows participants to join from anywhere, increasing convenience.
Ideal for global teams working across different time zones.
Makes meetings more inclusive for employees with mobility challenges.
Reduces commute time, allowing employees to focus on work.
Meetings can be scheduled and conducted faster without logistical constraints.
Easier to record and document, ensuring meeting takeaways are preserved.
Can accommodate large groups without requiring a bigger venue.
Webinars and company-wide announcements are more efficient in a virtual format.
Reduces carbon footprint by cutting down on travel and office energy consumption.
Supports sustainability goals by decreasing the need for printed materials.
While virtual meetings are convenient, in-person meetings still hold a strong advantage in certain situations. Here’s when they’re most beneficial:
Face-to-face interactions help strengthen professional relationships.
Personal meetings foster better team bonding and company culture.
Crucial for networking events and relationship-driven industries like sales and consulting.
In-person meetings make it easier to read body language and non-verbal cues.
Hands-on collaboration is more effective, especially when using physical tools (e.g., whiteboards, prototypes).
More productive for strategic planning, creative sessions, and problem-solving.
Important discussions, such as contract negotiations or sensitive HR matters, are better handled in person.
Minimizes the risk of miscommunication and ensures confidentiality.
Workshops, retreats, and team events help employees bond.
Strengthens company culture, which is crucial for employee retention.
Meetings with clients or stakeholders are often more impactful in person.
Personal interactions can improve trust and decision-making speed.
Hybrid meetings offer a best-of-both-worlds approach, blending the convenience of virtual meetings with the engagement of in-person interactions.
Allows employees to attend whether they are remote or in the office.
Supports diverse teams across different locations and time zones.
Gives employees the choice to work in a way that suits their preferences.
Reduces travel expenses while still allowing some in-person engagement.
Companies can downsize office space since not all employees need to be present.
Ideal for companies with distributed teams, enabling real-time collaboration.
Ensures global stakeholders can participate without the need for travel.
Employees can choose whether to attend in person or remotely, increasing job satisfaction.
Reduces burnout associated with excessive commuting or rigid office schedules.
Ensures seamless operations during unforeseen circumstances (e.g., pandemics, natural disasters).
Offers flexibility for hybrid or remote work policies without disrupting productivity.
Choosing the right meeting format depends on several factors, including purpose, audience, and logistics. Here’s a breakdown of how to decide:
Quick updates, status reports, and training sessions → Virtual meeting.
Strategy planning, brainstorming, and team bonding → In-person meeting.
Large conferences, hybrid teams, and company-wide events → Hybrid meeting.
If all attendees are in the same city, an in-person meeting may be ideal.
If attendees are spread across different locations, a virtual or hybrid meeting is more practical.
If cost-saving is a priority, virtual meetings eliminate travel and venue expenses.
If interaction is crucial, investing in an in-person or hybrid setup may be worthwhile.
If engagement is key, in-person meetings allow better interaction and real-time collaboration.
If remote inclusion is essential, hybrid meetings offer balance.
If speed and convenience matter most, virtual meetings are best.
Sensitive topics (e.g., HR discussions, financial negotiations) → In-person.
General updates or presentations → Virtual.
Moderate confidentiality with broader team involvement → Hybrid.
The beer mats here represent a model for the partnership between E4SP as a platform vendor and a carrier/SP, established after an hour of passionate debate (and a couple of beers) but also through the sharing and challenging of ideas and concepts.
From a technology tool kit point of view, the majority of knowledge workers will need to have a remote capability and, as a result, office meeting rooms must deliver a high-quality hybrid meeting capability. But for me, the key responsibility comes down to management and their ability to identify both the immediate and the longer-term outcomes that need to be achieved.
Training needs to be given on the skills required within both virtual and actual meetings but also on the hard and soft outcomes available for each. Technology can truly augment human performance, but there is the potential for additional outcomes when humans share time and experiences together. Conversations that are not asked to run to time and not restricted by on-screen annotation can often spiral into the most energetic and exciting exchange of ideas.
As a member of the cloud technology community, it is easy to write a narrative to suit the sales budget and our product specification, but our customers’ focus is and will always need to be on their outcomes – and for that, we still need to encourage and support human-to-human activity.
Yes, hybrid meetings are becoming the standard for modern businesses, offering a balance between in-person engagement and virtual convenience. They cater to remote work trends, global collaboration, and flexible work environments.